Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1999/00 Competition Specific
(Updated 25 Sept 1999)
Payload Questions:
- Question: What are the dimensions of the
water bottles?
Answer: Any round bottle may be used (tall, small
diameter; short, large diameter) as long as it is labeled by the
manufacturer as a 1 Liter bottle. Square, oval, oblong, rectangular
bottles are not allowed.
- Question: Can one use standard water bottles from the
store, for example an Evian bottle, as long as it is a 1 Liter
round bottle?
Answer: Most likely, no. Water bottles must be polyethylene
(a milky colored fairly soft plastic), most "store"
water bottles are polystyrene
- Question: Are wing pods for carrying the
cargo permitted? Is removal of the pods for empty flight a modification
to the aircraft structure?
Answer: Wing pods may be used for carrying the
payload. The pods may be removed to change payload, but must be
installed (empty) during the no payload cruise/ferry task.
Cost Formula Questions:
- Question: The battery voltage in mentioned
in the published rules is 1.2V. Is it allowed to use batteries
with a different voltage?
Answer: The 1.2V used in the cost formulas is
a "typical" value for a NiCad cell under load (it would
be higher under no load, and lower under high loads). All aircraft
must use NiCad batteries. The actual circuit
voltage will vary depending on the actual load at any time. The
"nominal" 1.2V value will be used for the cost formulas.
- Question: The engine power model assumes
a current of 50A in the computations. If a fuse of 40A is used
in the circuit can that value be used in the cost computation?
Answer: No. Like the 1.2V value, the 50A value
was selected for the cost model as an arbitrary current level
typical of model aircraft propulsion systems. The 50A value must
be used in the cost model. Teams may determine the actual current
levels they operate at based on their particular components capabilities
and reliability.
- Question: In the cost formula the REP equation contains
both the number of engines, and the number of cells. How are multiple
engine REP's computed?
Answer: The REP is computed for each engine multiplied
by the number of cells powering that engine. The individual engine
REP's are then summed for the total REP. For example: (1) If there
are 2 engines connected to a single 20 cell pack, the REP would
be
2 engine*50A*1.2V*20 cells
(2) If there are two engines each connected to a separate 14 cell
pack, the REP would be
1 engine*50A*1.2V*14 cells + 1 engine*50A*1.2V*14 cells.
- Question: Are the initial cost for set-up
per span or per semi-span?
Answer: Per span.
- Question: Is a flying wing considered to
have a fuselage?
Answer: It has a fuselage if any body portion
extends beyond the "natural" planform of the wing. That
includes a "squashed" cross-section nacelle or boom
if the resulting section through it is not an "airfoil",
and if there is a clear chord length "jump" to the body
region.
- Question: Does the length of the fuselage
or pod extend through the wing chord?
Answer: If an individual body (be it fuselage
or pod) extends both ahead of and behind the wing planform, the
length across the wing chord is included, as the body length is
from the leading to trailing end of the body. If a body exists
only ahead of or behind the wing planform, but not both, the length
of the body is that length beyond the wing planform (and the area
over the wing planform is considered to be a fairing).
- Question: Where is the line drawn between
a bump on a wing and a pod? For instance, what are mostly
embedded engines, unfaired motor mounts, and faired, externally
mounted servos considered?
Answer: A wing mounted nacelle/engine (faired
or not) or boom is a pod, as is any other wing mounted structure
that extends outside of the basic wing planform (i.e. ahead of
the leading edge, behind the trailing edge, or spanwise beyond
the wing tip profile when the high lift devices are retracted).
The length is that portion of the pod (including a spinner) that
extends beyond the wing planform. Servo fairings are not considered
a pod if their footprint lies entirely within the wing or fuselage
surface.
- Question: Where do V-tails fit into the cost/
complexity formula?
Answer: A "V" tail would be the same
as one horizontal plus one vertical. It is still two separate
surfaces that need to be manufactured. The area of a horizontal
is usually greater than a vertical which is the reason for the
greater "cost" in the formula. The additional rigging
complexities of the "V" tail justify it having the same
cost as a conventional horizontal plus vertical tail.
- Question: How is a flying wing with a single
vertical still considered in the empenage cost formula"
Answer: It would be "charged" with
a basic empenage cost, and a vertical tail surface cost. There
would be no cost for a horizontal, since it doesn't have one.
- Question: Are winglets taxed under the cost/
complexity formula? What about aerodynamic biplane struts and
wing braces or multi-surface wings?
Answer: A winglet (or tip sail) is included in
the projected area of the wing as if it was folded down flat and
added to the span of the wing, but is not treated as a separate
surface (i.e. a wing plus winglet will be computed as only one
"wing", but with a larger total span). Interplane struts
are not included in the cost (we can't think of everything teams
may want to try!). Multi-surface wings are treated as multiple
wings with the exception that slats/flaps are considered part
of the main wing.
The projected wing area is the projected area of each "wing"
taken individually. For example, a biplane will have 2 wings,
each with it's own projected area. For wings or wing panels with
any type of extensible high-lift device (Slat, FCK, VCK, Flap
etc.) the wing projected area used will be at the high-lift device
setting which causes the greatest projected area.
- Question: Just how big can a canard or horizontal
be before it is considered a wing?
Answer: If there are multiple flying surfaces,
and there is no overlap between the surface,
the largest area one is considered a wing. If the "other"
surfaces have a high-lift system, they will be considered to be
a second (or third) wing.
Flight / Mission Questions
- Question: The rules state the aircraft must have the
wheels off the ground in 100 feet. Is there any height requirement?
Answer: No, the rules are correct as stated. Aircraft must
have ALL wheels off the ground by the 100 foot line, and
they must remain off until the landing. Their is no "obstacle"
height requirement for this year.
- Question: Can the battery pack be changed out
or "topped off" between sorties?
Answer: No. Only payload may be unloaded and reloaded.
Batteries may not be recharged.
- Question: Is there a minimum altitude for flying the
course?
Answer: No. Altitude must be high enough for safe flight
as set by the discretion of the Contest Director.
- Question: How are the turns made, and is there a set
turn radius?
Answer: The turns may not be initiated until the turn judge
raises his flag (for the two 180 degree turns), but may then proceed
to be any turn radius and rate the aircraft is capable of. The
360 degree turn can be initiated anytime the aircraft is on the
"downwind" leg and also may be any turn radius and rate
the aircraft is capable of.
- Question: Is it safe to assume that if the rules do
not explicitly forbid something, it is allowed?
Answer: The rules are intentionally designed to not impose
too many limitations while allowing each team an equal chance.
If something adheres to the "spirit" of the rules it
is likely to be allowed. If you have any specific questions you
would like clarified they may be addressed in a private e-mail
to the contest administrator. Ideas will not be disclosed to other
teams if they represent a legal and innovative approach. If it
is deemed to be not legal, it may be added to this FAQ or posted
to the other teams at the administrators discretion.
- Question: If the aircraft runs off the runway but is
not damaged, can the ground crew help retrieve it?
Answer: If the aircraft runs off the runway, the ground
crew can go to retrieve it once it has stopped. If the aircraft
is undamaged, they will return it to the runway to taxi back.
If it is damaged and is unable to taxi back, the ground crew may
carry it back and make repairs.
- Question: Where must the "minor repairs"
be made?
Answer: Repairs must be made on the starting line if the
plane is to be eligible to make an additional sortie within the
"10 minute" time period.
Repairs for the "30 minute" rule may be made at the
teams pit, but must be clearly "repairs" not getting
out another airplane. You can't change out the fuselage, wing
or empenage with new parts, you must repair the "flown"
primary airframe structure. Systems (radio, servos, propulsion)
and secondary airframe structure (landing gear legs, wheels) may
be replaced and qualify for the repair rule.
General Questions
- Question: Can there be thrust vectoring via rotating
the engine, nozzles, blown surfaces etc.?
Answer: Yes. Any of the above options is allowed,
and may be varied during flight. However, "rotary wing"
vehicles are not allowed, so you may need to consult the judges
with your specific design and it's thrust levels to be sure it
doesn't cross over the line into vertical flight capability.
- Question: What is a sortie and what is meant by multiple
sorties may be flown?
Answer: For this years (99/00) competition there are two
different sorties, a payload sortie and a return/ferry sortie.
Only the payload sortie adds points to the flight score. The return/ferry
sortie is required between payload sorties, and provides an additional
and different design point. Teams may complete as many cycles
of theses "sorties" as possible within their given 10
minute competition time period.
- Question: Do all of the team members need to be student
members of AIAA?
Answer: Since the DBF is part of the AIAA competitions
sanctioned by the Student Activities Committee and the AIAA Foundation,
all team members should be student members of the AIAA.
- Question: What was the maximum number of people that
can make-up a team.
Answer: There is no specific limit on team size. It is
up to the team itself to determine a size sufficient to meet the
required tasks and small enough to remain manageable. It is expected
most teams would fall in the 5 to 10 member size range, but this
is only an estimated guideline.
There is a maximum size of the flight crew (pilot and assistant)
and ground crew (3) for this years competition. Please see the
RULES section for more details on the limitations on the flight
and ground crews.
- Question: Is it necessary to list all team members
on the entry.
Answer: Yes, we need to know all the team members to verify
the under/upper classmen rule.
- Question: What is meant by "Upper and Under Classmen"
Answer: Upper Classmen are (for purposes of the contest)
seniors and/or graduate students. Lower Classmen are Freshmen,
Sophomores and Juniors.
- Question: Is it allowed to have/declare more then 1
pilot in a team (in case one of them can not go to the contest,
or simply have a back-up pilot)?
Answer: Yes, teams may register multiple pilots as long
as each meets the requirements listed in the rules.
- Question: Can we have corporate sponsors? If so, can
we put their logo on the UAV at any place that pleases them?
Answer: Teams may solicit and accept sponsorship in the
form of funds or materials and components from commercial organizations.
All design, analysis and fabrication of the contest entry is the
sole responsibility of the team members.
Sponsor and university decals or logos may be placed as desired.
Teams should make sure that the final color scheme of the aircraft
provides good visibility of the aircraft location and orientation
for the pilot.
- Question: What is COB in the submission dates mean?
Answer: COB - Close of Business: data must ARRIVE by 5
PM local time at the specified location.
- Question: When will we receive information of the exact
contest location, housing options, and the contest day schedule?
Answer: Detailed contest location and schedule information
will be sent to the teams by January 1999.
- Question: The contest day is graduation. Is there any
possibility of moving the contest.
Answer: In selecting the contest date we have tried to
minimize the conflicts with graduation, finals, mothers day,...
We can't miss all possible conflicts as each university is on
a slightly different schedule. Moving the date earlier would greatly
increase the risk of unacceptable weather, and further shorten
the time available to design and build the entries (which will
seem VERY short by then).
- Question: We were wondering if it wouldn't be easier
to just send an official representative from the competition to
our school, fly our plane, and take down the score. Then compare
with all the other schools competing(they'd probably be on home
turf as well), and make the final decision that way?
Answer: The single site -vs- fly-at-home issue was discussed
much by the contest organizers prior to selecting the current
contest structure for many of the same reasons you raised. We
realize that it is difficult for students to obtain funds for
fabricating an entry, even without the added costs of travel.
In the end we selected the single-site format for mainly two reasons:
(1) the single-site format will allow the teams to see each others
entries and learn from each other and will add to the competitive
fever always present when pitting your best efforts against others;
and (2) the single site is the only way to assure a level playing
field for all entries, as weather variations at multiple sites
and days would inevitably help some entries and hinder others.
- Question: At what wind speed will the contest be called.
Answer: It will be up to each team to determine whether
they want to fly or not. The contest will be called (and the rain
date used) if the wind speed exceeds 30 mph for a period of time
sufficient to prevent all teams who are ready to fly from being
assigned a flight time slot. The 30 mph limit is consistent with
normal AMA competitions and is required to retain our contest
insurance coverage.
- Question: Will a hard runway be used?
Answer: We will select a site that provides a paved runway.
Note that a "smooth" paved runway for manned aircraft
may still seem "rough" for contest aircraft.
- Question: Our team has completed our design calculations
and we have found a manufacturer that carries wing components
that will meet our design criteria. Can we purchase components
(i.e. foam cores and skins) to construct the wing for our UAV,
or are we required to build it from scratch?
Answer: You may use unassembled components such as wing
cores providing they are integrated in a way that results in the
final configuration being an original design.
- Question: Does the plane have to be an external propeller
plane, or can it be a duct fan UAV?
Answer: Ducted fans are also legal if they use a commercial
fan assembly.
- Question: In terms of propellers. Can they be any kind
of Gas engine propeller if we wish? Or do they have to be Electric
motor propellers? And if we can only use electric motor propellers,
can we cut them? Basically, if we wish to, can we use any kind
of non-electric motor propellers if they are commercially available?
Answer: Any commercial propeller for either gas or electric
models may be used. Props may be cut to reduce their diameter
but the blades may not be reduced in thickness (such as by sanding
the airfoils to a new profile) or in chord (such as by trimming
the trailing edges).
- Question: What constitutes "over the counter"
batteries, and does this apply to the battery pack or to the individual
cells?
Answer: The "Over the Counter" refers to the
individual cells. This is a change from the rule for the 1996/97
contest year.
- Question: Could the electricians in the Electronics
Shop at our university build the battery pack, since they are
licensed electricians?
Answer: Yes, as long as they use commercially available
cells.
- Question: Do you have a vendor list for speed controller
and/or gear reduction suppliers?
Answer: The "MOTORS" and "ACCESSORIES"
sources listed on the web site vendor page can supply controller
and gearbox sources that are suited to their motors. Other sources
would include all of the major hobby part suppliers listed in
RC magazines.
- Question: How is the radio fail-safe described in the
safety supplement to be implemented.
Answer: This is a feature available in many production
RC radio systems. It is required that your
radio system be able to provide this function.
- Question: Can we construct a composite can for an otherwise
stock over the counter model motor?
Does the motor controller have to be an over-the-counter controller?
Answer: The motor and/or controller must be an unmodified
commercial product. The intent of this rule is to prevent excessive
cost, and to provide all teams access to equal propulsion technology
so they can concentrate on the aircraft aerodynamics and structural
aspects.
- Question: Do the wires and connectors have to be commercially
available?
Answer: Yes
- Question: When you check the CG, what kind of a point
will you use? For example will it be checked with fingers or dowels
or something even sharper?
Answer: The CG check will be coincident with the structural
verification test described in the Safety Requirements supplement
to the basic rules. Specifically, two team members will be asked
to pick the aircraft up by the wing tips using their hands (usually
a clenched fist placed under the wing at the desired location
works well). They will (gently) lift the aircraft at it's full
contest weight by the wing tips at the marked axial CG location.
- Question: Will the payload be supplied by the team
or the contest administration?
Answer: By the team.
- Question: If battery power fails can an immediate landing
be made without making a complete lap (question paraphrased by
editor)
Answer: First priority is safety of personnel, followed
by minimizing damage to equipment. If power fails unexpectedly
the pilot will setup for as safe an emergency landing as possible.
If the plane does not pass the downwind pylon that sortie's payload
will not count, but any prior sorties will still be credited toward
the overall score.
- Question: Will there be a maximum altitude, other than
the visibility requirement?
Answer: There is no specific numerical altitude limit.
It would be very difficult to enforce a rigorous altitude limit
without altitude telemetry equipment on each aircraft which would
be a significant expense burden. The contest flight judge will
enforce maintaining a "safe" altitude for both personnel/ground
and flight visibility reasons, and may order the pilot to descend
if he feels the altitude is too high. In general, altitudes of
300 to 500 feet are probably nominal, and altitudes near 1000
feet are likely to have the judge order a decent.
- Question: Is information available about previous year
designs and results?
Answer: A summary of characteristics for all the entries
that competed in the last years contest will be available on the
contest web site. Remember that the objective of the prior years
contest was slightly different, so you will have to adapt the
design data accordingly. (Prior year rules will also be maintained
on the web site for reference.)
- Question: Would we ever have to make any vertical loops
with the UAV?
Answer: No
[Top] [AIAA Student Design/Build/Fly Competition homepage][AIAA Homepage]
Webmaster m-selig@uiuc.edu